Loading page
About this tool
Fill-in-the-blank AI prompts for job posts, structured interviews, onboarding plans, policies and performance reviews.
The HR Prompt Pack is a library of 12 fill-in-the-blank AI prompts covering the documents people teams write most often: job posts, de-biased adverts, structured interview guides with scorecards, 30-60-90 onboarding plans, plain-English policies, evidence-based performance reviews, SBI feedback scripts and exit interviews. Each prompt fixes the structure and the fairness constraints in advance — behavioural questions in STAR form, rubrics tied to observable evidence, no comment on protected characteristics — so the draft is usable rather than generic. Everything is assembled in your browser and copied out to whichever assistant you use.
Open HR Prompt Pack on AltFTool — it loads instantly in your browser.
Add your input to the workspace.
Adjust the options until the result looks right.
Copy or download the output and put it to work.
Prompts rule out protected-characteristic questions, personality-based review language and coded job-ad wording by default.
The review and feedback prompts require every claim to trace back to an example you supplied, and say so when none exists.
Prompts are assembled in the browser; employee names and details you type never leave the page.
You can use it to produce a first draft to react to, but not to publish unreviewed. Employment law varies by country and state, and a model cannot know your jurisdiction's notice periods, consultation duties or working-time rules, so every draft here ends with a list of points to check with a qualified employment lawyer.
A structured interview means every candidate gets the same predetermined questions, in the same order, scored against the same written rubric. Decades of selection research consistently find structured interviews predict job performance substantially better than unstructured ones, mostly because they stop interviewers from following whatever thread they find interesting.
Give it only observed evidence and require it to say 'no evidence supplied' rather than filling the gap. The review prompt bans personality language such as 'attitude' or 'not a team player', bans comments on communication style that commonly carry cultural and gender bias, and asks for behaviour and impact instead — but a human still has to check the result against what actually happened.
Treat it as you would any third-party processor: most consumer AI tools are not covered by your employment data agreements, and pasting names, health information or disciplinary details may breach GDPR or your own privacy notice. Use role descriptions and initials instead of names, and check your organisation's approved-tools list before pasting anything identifiable.