Visa Rejection Reason Explainer

10: Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Schengen, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey, USA, Vietnam. Pick one at the top of the tool; the page link updates (for example ?v=australia) so you can bookmark or share that exact view.

It means the delegate was not satisfied, under clause 600.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations, that you genuinely intend to stay only temporarily for the purpose stated. The assessment weighs your circumstances at home, your immigration history, conditions in your country of residence and any other relevant matter. It is a satisfaction test on the evidence filed, not an allegation of dishonesty, so it is answered with better proof of what you return to.

It is the standard conclusion under section 179(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations - for study permits, section 216(1)(b) - that the officer was not satisfied you would depart when your authorised stay ended. It is a balance-of-ties judgement, not a finding of dishonesty. The ticked sub-factors underneath it, such as travel history, purpose of visit, family ties or employment prospects, tell you which part of the balance failed.

Most rejections are specification failures rather than judgements: a photograph that is not a recent colour image on a plain white background at the stated size, a passport with under six months validity, a data page scan with glare or cropping, a name typed differently from the passport, or missing evidence of a confirmed return ticket and accommodation. Fix the exact defect before reapplying - the fee is charged again and is not refunded.

Box 9 means the consulate had reasonable doubts about your intention to leave the Schengen area before the visa expired, under Article 32(1)(b) of the Visa Code. It is a judgement on the strength of your home ties as shown in the file - employment, income, dependants, property, prior travel - and not an accusation of dishonesty, so it is answered with more evidence of what you are returning to rather than with an apology.

Because ICA does not disclose reasons. The grant of an entry visa is a discretionary decision of the Controller of Immigration under the Immigration Act 1959, and there is no statutory duty to explain an unsuccessful outcome and no appeal channel. The practical response is to review each assessment area - form and photograph compliance, the local contact, funds, purpose, ties and immigration record - and reapply only once something material has changed.

Korean missions commonly apply a six-month reapplication restriction from the date of refusal, waived only where circumstances have materially changed - a new job, a new sponsor, a completed course or a resolved record. The exact wording is set by each mission, so read the notice from the one that refused you. Treat the next application as the only one you get for that period and build it completely.

The long-standing immigration benchmark is at least 20,000 baht per person, or 40,000 baht per family, available for the stay - and consulates usually want to see that held across a three to six month statement history rather than deposited days before you applied. Long-stay classes set their own figures: the Destination Thailand Visa asks for 500,000 baht, and the retirement route asks for 800,000 baht on deposit or 65,000 baht of monthly income.

At least 60 days beyond the duration of stay granted by the visa - not the six months most countries ask for. For a 90-day e-Visa that works out at roughly five months of validity from the entry date. Add the duration of stay to your entry date, add 60 days, and check the passport outlives that date before you apply.

It means you did not overcome the statutory presumption in INA 214(b) that every nonimmigrant applicant intends to immigrate. It is a discretionary judgement about the strength of your ties abroad and the coherence of your trip, not a ban - there is no waiting period and no waiver, and a later officer can decide differently once a concrete fact has changed. H-1B and L-1 applicants are exempt from the presumption because those categories allow dual intent.

Most rejections come down to the uploaded images or a data mismatch: a portrait taken at an angle or wearing glasses, a passport scan with glare or a cut-off corner, a name typed in the wrong field, a middle name omitted, or a single wrong character in the passport number. There is no interview and no chance to correct a file mid-process, so every field has to match the passport's machine-readable zone exactly at the moment you submit.