Loading page
A maintained list of 1,432 directories, launch platforms, registries and marketplaces that accept product submissions. 1,134 of them are free or have a free tier, and 192 are quick wins — free, low effort, and worth doing first. Every row shows cost, effort and priority, and links straight to the submission page.
The table is wider than the screen — swipe it sideways for cost, effort and the preparation notes.
| # | Impact (sorted) | Site — sort by this | Domain | Type | Cost | Effort — sort by this | Priority | Status | What to prepare | Rules / caveat | Checked | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92 | eLearning Industry | elearningindustry.com | Review platforms | Free + paid tier | Involved | Do first | Verified live | Submit an original L&D article on teaching practical privacy or accessibility skills, linking only to a genuinely informative your tool guide where it supports the lesson. | Free guest posts may link to informative content but cannot mention or promote the company/product; promotional links belong to sponsored articles. Relevant, original, reader-friendly work is editorially reviewed, HR-only topics are excluded, affiliation should be disclosed, timing/inclusion is not guaranteed, and any author/content link should be treated as editorial/UGC with no followed-link promise. | 2026-08-03 | Open eLearning Industry submit page (new tab)eLearning Industry details |
| 2 | 84 | Bioconductor | bioconductor.org | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | High | Verified live | If your tool ships a legitimate genomics or bioinformatics utility, package it for R with complete vignettes and submit it for review. | Only in-scope, scientifically useful and maintainable packages qualify; peer review and continuous checks apply. | 2026-08-03 | Open Bioconductor submit page (new tab)Bioconductor details |
| 3 | 84 | CrawlRabbit | crawlrabbit.com | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | High | Verified live | Create a free owner account, submit your tool and manage the approved public listing. | Site must be live with original content; misleading or thin submissions are rejected. | 2026-08-03 | Open CrawlRabbit submit page (new tab)CrawlRabbit details |
| 4 | 84 | Dailyweb.Design | dailyweb.design | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | High | Verified live | Submit your tool strongest polished page for free manual design review and possible gallery inclusion. | Approval is selective; submit only production-ready original design and do not repeatedly resubmit or solicit links. | Official Dailyweb.Design submission page checked 2026-08-07 | Open Dailyweb.Design submit page (new tab)Dailyweb.Design details |
| 5 | 81 | GeeksforGeeks Contribute | geeksforgeeks.org | Review platforms | Free | Involved | High | Verified live | Write an original technical article about a broadly useful browser-security, privacy, or accessibility technique and cite your tool only when it is a necessary working example. | Articles are submitted for review and promotional, incorrect, or plagiarized work can be rejected. Use original code and images, disclose affiliation, and do not turn the article into an AltFTool sales page. Review timing, publication, author-page visibility, and rel/follow behavior are not guaranteed. | 2026-08-03 | Open GeeksforGeeks Contribute submit page (new tab)GeeksforGeeks Contribute details |
| 6 | 81 | LottieFiles | lottiefiles.com | Review platforms | Free + paid tier | Moderate | High | Verified live | Publish original your tool privacy, safety, or accessibility micro-animations as a coherent creator collection, with a contextual project link where the profile permits it. | Public uploads are reviewed and use the Lottie Simple License; upload only original rights-cleared work and avoid duplicate promotional variants. | Official LottieFiles public upload, limits, and licensing guidance checked 2026-08-07 | Open LottieFiles submit page (new tab)LottieFiles details |
| 7 | 77 | Codemotion Magazine | codemotion.com | Review platforms | Not stated | Involved | High | Verified live | Pitch a practical privacy-tool engineering article, code walkthrough, or review grounded in your tool implementation experience. | Only original useful content is accepted; sales pitches, press releases, and commercially driven copy are explicitly rejected. | Official Codemotion contributor guidance checked 2026-08-07 | Open Codemotion Magazine submit page (new tab)Codemotion Magazine details |
| 8 | 66 | ADPList | adplist.org | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Apply only if the founder or team member has real design/engineering leadership experience and intends to provide genuine mentoring, then add an accurate personal website/profile reference. | Mentor approval criteria apply and a public profile must represent a real person, expertise, availability, and service—not a company backlink. Deliver actual mentorship and disclose AltFTool affiliation. Acceptance timing, profile discovery, external-link display, and rel/follow status are not guaranteed. | 2026-08-03 | Open ADPList submit page (new tab)ADPList details |
| 9 | 66 | MentorCruise | mentorcruise.com | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Have a qualified founder or senior team member apply as a privacy, accessibility, product, or engineering mentor and add your tool only as truthful experience/personal-site evidence. | Applications are manually reviewed, typically within 14 days, and official help says fewer than 10% are accepted; a real headshot, bio, LinkedIn, and relevant expertise are required. The profile must support actual paid mentoring, not link placement. External links are profile UGC with no approval, traffic, or followed-link guarantee. | 2026-08-03 | Open MentorCruise submit page (new tab)MentorCruise details |
| 10 | 66 | Nmap NSE Documentation | nmap.org | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Develop a safe, useful Nmap NSE script related to an your tool security check and include accurate author or homepage metadata. | Script must be original, valuable, documented, tested, properly licensed, and accepted into Nmap; never add intrusive behavior merely for exposure. | 2026-08-05 — https://nmap.org/book/nse-script-format.html | Open Nmap NSE Documentation submit page (new tab)Nmap NSE Documentation details |
| 11 | 66 | ProjectDiscovery Nuclei Templates | projectdiscovery.io | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Create high-confidence defensive templates for authorized checks of privacy leaks or misconfigurations, include safe matchers and test evidence, then submit them for review. | Authorized defensive use only; avoid intrusive actions, require reproducible evidence, minimize false positives, follow severity and metadata rules, and provide safe testing. | Official Nuclei template creation guide and contribution repository checked 2026-08-05 | Open ProjectDiscovery Nuclei Templates submit page (new tab)ProjectDiscovery Nuclei Templates details |
| 12 | 66 | SigmaHQ Rules | sigmahq.io | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Create generic defensive Sigma rules for privacy-leak, credential-exposure, or scam-related log patterns, validate them, cite legitimate references, and submit a PR. | Rules need unique IDs, accurate log sources, low false-positive logic, valid references, tests and conventions; no offensive payloads or unverified claims. | Official Sigma rule repository, contribution guide, and 2025 rule guide checked 2026-08-05 | Open SigmaHQ Rules submit page (new tab)SigmaHQ Rules details |
| 13 | 62 | PoPETs / PETS | petsymposium.org | Review platforms | Not stated | Moderate | Medium | Verified live | Submit novel privacy-technology research plus a reproducibility artifact that links to its public implementation. | Strict novelty, ethics, anonymization and AI policies; artifact link appears only after review and acceptance. | 2026-08-05 — https://petsymposium.org/cfp27.php | Open PoPETs / PETS submit page (new tab)PoPETs / PETS details |
| 14 | 46 | CoMSES Computational Model Library | comses.net | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Later | Verified live | Publish a documented social, ecological, or computational model with source, narrative documentation, contributors, and reproducibility metadata. | Only genuine computational models qualify; optional peer review and DOI require stronger documentation and reproducibility. | Official CoMSES publishing guide and FAQ checked 2026-08-05 | Open CoMSES Computational Model Library submit page (new tab)CoMSES Computational Model Library details |
| 15 | 46 | nf-core | nf-co.re | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Later | Verified live | Propose and contribute a standards-compliant your tool-related bioinformatics privacy module, subworkflow, or full Nextflow pipeline. | Must solve a real bioinformatics need, avoid overlap, use nf-core templates, include tests and docs, pass linting, review, and maintenance expectations. | 2026-08-05 — https://nf-co.re/docs/contributing/overview | Open nf-core submit page (new tab)nf-core details |
| 16 | 46 | ReScience C | rescience.github.io | Review platforms | Free | Moderate | Later | Verified live | Independently reproduce a published computational privacy or security result with open code and data, using your tool only where scientifically justified. | Must replicate existing research rigorously with a fully open stack; reviewers must reproduce the results before acceptance. | 2026-08-05 — https://rescience.github.io/write/ | Open ReScience C submit page (new tab)ReScience C details |
| 17 | 43 | Qeios | qeios.com | Review platforms | Free + paid tier | Moderate | Later | Verified live | Post a substantive study of privacy-preserving browser tools or redaction reliability with transparent methods and data. | Research only; promotional content is forbidden, conflicts are public, and DOI versions are permanent. Never buy Pro solely for a link. | 2026-08-05 — https://www.qeios.com/publishing-policy | Open Qeios submit page (new tab)Qeios details |
Behind the list
Every row here starts as a line in a sheet, gets normalised into one of 15 groups, scored for cost, effort and impact, and written up with the steps to actually submit. The floor below represents that pipeline.
Open the sheet viewAn illustration of the AltF Backlinks floor: opportunities sourced at the back, vetted for cost and effort by the engineering pod, written up for outreach by the design pod, then tracked to placement along a line.
One-shot launches where timing and preparation decide the outcome.
Fast-growing listings specifically for AI-powered tools.
Extension, plugin and integration stores. Real review processes, real distribution.
Startup listings, beta lists and founder media.
General tool and software catalogues with real search traffic.
B2B review sites. Slow to approve, strong once live.
Package, image and docs hosting that carries real authority.
Showcases judged on craft. A good screenshot matters more than copy.
Write once, link back. Editorial standards vary widely.
Get quoted or distribute a release. Slower, higher ceiling.
Company and local listings. Unglamorous, consistently indexed.
Owned pages you control: company, founder, knowledge-panel entities.
Answer real questions. Never drop a bare link.
Brand surface and referral traffic more than link equity.
Everything that does not fit the buckets above.