Preview data: all rankings, scores, votes, refresh labels, methodology, testing and editorial-process statements in Top 49 are illustrative demo content, not live measurements or documented reviews.
#16 in Dividend ETFs
of 16 ranked entries
Fidelity · Launched 2016
FDVV combines a current-yield screen with a dividend-growth-potential factor, structurally attempting to balance the two approaches most peer funds treat as separate strategies. Recorded specifics: launched 2016, issuer Fidelity, category Dividend Growth. Panel highlighted blends current-yield and growth-potential factors in a single structural methodology, reasonable expense ratio for a multi-factor approach and backed by Fidelity’s broader fund-research infrastructure. The reservation on record is blended methodology is structurally harder to evaluate than a single clear factor screen.
Score breakdown
Each criterion is scored independently, then combined using the weights published on Dividend ETFs.
On the record
| Launched | 2016 |
|---|---|
| Issuer | Fidelity |
| Category | Dividend Growth |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% |
Panel verdict
What it gets right
Where it gives ground
1 appearance
From the same list
Charles Schwab · Launched 2011
SCHD screens for companies with at least ten consecutive years of dividend payments alongside quality metrics like cash flow and return on equity, a structurally more selective methodology than funds that simply rank by current yield.
Vanguard · Launched 2006
VIG requires a minimum ten-year streak of consecutive dividend increases for index inclusion, structurally prioritising growth consistency over the highest current payout among eligible companies.
Vanguard · Launched 2006
VYM is structured around current payout level rather than growth consistency, tracking an index of US companies with above-average dividend yields at the time of each rebalance.
BlackRock · Launched 2003
DVY applies a five-year consecutive-payment screen combined with a payout-ratio filter, a structurally older methodology than several newer entrants on this list but with one of the longest continuous track records.
State Street · Launched 2005
SDY tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index, which structurally requires at least twenty consecutive years of dividend increases for inclusion — a longer track record requirement than most peer funds.
ProShares · Launched 2013
NOBL applies the strictest tenure screen on this list — twenty-five consecutive years of dividend increases and S&P 500 membership — resulting in a structurally smaller, more concentrated holdings list than broader dividend funds.
JPMorgan Asset Management · Launched 2020
JEPI is structured differently from the rest of this list — it combines equity holdings with a written options overlay to generate income, a fundamentally different mechanism than a straightforward dividend-screened equity fund.
Invesco · Launched 2012
SPHD combines a high-dividend screen with a low-volatility filter, structurally narrowing its universe to companies that meet both criteria simultaneously rather than optimising for yield alone.
Top 49 rankings are editorial. Scores are produced from the published criteria on each list and are refreshed on the cadence stated there. Figures shown across this section are curated demonstration data.