A persona hub does not just filter the list — it re-scores the whole corpus using a weighting tuned to that situation. A solo founder sees feasibility weighted more than twice as heavily as moat; a venture-track founder sees the opposite. Same six signals, different question.
Ranked for one person shipping alone: feasibility is weighted more than twice as heavily as moat, because an idea you cannot finish is worth nothing regardless of how defensible it would have been.
See the ranking →no engineering backgroundNon-technical foundersWeighted toward ideas where the hard part is distribution or domain knowledge rather than engineering, and away from mechanisms that need a research team.
See the ranking →profitable early, no outside moneyBootstrappersMonetisation carries almost twice its normal weight and timing carries half. A bootstrapper needs revenue before a window closes, not a bet on one opening.
See the ranking →small budget, limited hoursStudentsFiltered to what fits around coursework: a small first version, low startup cost, and a first customer reachable without a network you do not have yet.
See the ranking →productising existing service workAgenciesFor teams that already sell hours and want a product. Weighted to monetisation and feasibility, because the distribution problem is already solved.
See the ranking →can build, wants a marketDevelopersAssumes the build is the easy part. Moat and open field are weighted up, so the list favours ideas where the durable advantage is not just shipping first.
See the ranking →raising, needs a large outcomeVC-track foundersMoat and demand dominate, feasibility barely counts. These are the ideas that are hard to build on purpose, because that is the point.
See the ranking →leaving a job, has domain knowledgeCareer changersFor people whose advantage is knowing an industry from the inside. Ranked so that domain-heavy, unglamorous workflows rise rather than sink.
See the ranking →